911 In Plane Site

Transcript for 911 In Plane Site

Please be advised that the information you are about to view is
overwhelmingly significant.ハ We offer no conclusions but simply present
the evidence and let you, the viewing audience, draw your own
conclusions.ハ It is vital that we also mention that the footage you are
about to view comes from many of the largest news agencies in the
United States who covered in the events which unfolded on September 11,

Efforts were made to contact these news agencies and obtain releases
for a footage to which we draw attention.ハ However, most of all
attempts were unsuccessful as we were informed that no licenses would
be granted.ハ Our initial reaction was to pause and rethink our position
on releasing this documentary.ハ But after careful thought we could not
let this information be kept from the American people and indeed from
the global community, as it affects both national security ended global
security respectively.

Chapter 1
Itユs been said that all truth passes through three stages. The first stage being denial, the second stage being violent opposition, and the third stage being widespread acceptance as common knowledge. Well, as you view this documentary, keep in mind that people watching will probably fall into one of those three categories.ハ One group of people will absolutely deny that what they seeing could possibly be true.ハ The second group of people will be violently opposed to this kind of information being released, and they'll do everything that they can to discredit the messenger rather than pay attention to the message.ハ And yet, there'll probably be third group of people that will sit back in
their easy chair and say. メ I'm not surprised, I knew it all along.モ

With this in mind, let's begin by playing a little word association.
I'll say about word and you think of the first word that comes to mind.

Conspiracyノノ メTheoryモ is what most people think of.ハ We've all been conditioned to associate the word メtheoryモ with the word conspiracy because after all, no conspiracies could possibly be true, they're all just theories aren't they?ハ Well, in the phrase メconspiracy theoryモユ there are two words. The first word, conspiracy, the second word it is the active word, メtheoryモ.ハ By definition a theory is a supposition, and the idea, a concept, a hypothesis.ハ


Let me give you an example: メIn theory if I purchased a raffle ticket I could win a prize.モ Now as long as I don't purchase a raffle tickets my win is theoretical.ハ But once you purchase a raffle ticket the win is no longer a theory, it
becomes a possibility.ハ And the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible and the eventually probable though win becomes.

例をあげましょう。「もし宝くじを買った ら、賞金が当たるかもしれない」。宝くじを買わないかぎり、賞金を当てることは仮説です。しかし、いちど宝くじを買えば当たることは仮説ではなくなり、 可能性になります。そしてもっと宝くじを買えば、それだけ可能性が大きくなり、ついには当たることが確実になってきます。

Such is the case with a conspiracy theory.ハ As long as there is no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory.ハ But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy a tent circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility.ハ And the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible and eventually probable the conspiracy is.


You'll be looking at evidence in this documentary and it will be up to you to decide if this is a conspiracy theory, or indeed, a conspiracy. 


George Bush: メLet us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11.ハ Malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.モ

On September 11, 2001, four events occurred within an hour and it 15 minutes of one another.ハ The first event occurred at 8:45 eastern standard time when American Airlines flight 11 hit the north tower of World Trade Center.ハ And then 18 minutes later at 9:03 eastern time, United Airlines flight 175 slammed into the south tower of the World Trade Center.ハ And then at 943, it was reported that American Airlines
flight 77 had hit the Pentagon.ハ And then, finally at 10 o'clock Eastern Time, United Airlines flight 93 crashed in Shanksville Pennsylvania.


Now unless this is one incredible coincidence, is it not safe to assume that all four of these events are inescapably married to one another? And it is it not also safe to assume that if you find one person involved or party involved with one of these events, they are probably involved with all of them?ハ Well, following this train of thought,
since there was no credible claim of responsibility, is it not safe to assume that those involved or those parties involved or agencies or groups that were involved in the events of 911 would do anything that they can to obfuscate, distract, distort, or cover up any information that might lead to their discovery?ハ


And if that's true, is it not also safe to assume that if you find somebody, a group, an agency, a party that is involved in the obfuscation, distraction, distortion, or cover up of any information involved in any of the events of 911, does it not indicate possible involvement and even guilty in the events of 911?
Keep this in mind as we look at the video evidence of September 11.


Chapter 2
Witness: メI mean it was like a cruise missile with wings that went right there and slammed into the Pentagonノ. a huge explosion, a ball of fire, smoke started billowing out.モ


Shortly after September 11, as what usually happened is many conspiracy theories began to emerge as to what really happened on September 11 of 2001.ハ And it because many of these theories were not grounded with any evidence, we didn't really pay too much attention to them.ハ However, in February of 2002, my attention was drawn to the following web site and titled メHunt the Boeing, cast your perceptions.モ


Now the original web site was completely in French, and was released by the French, and drew some very serious questions as to what had really happened at the Pentagon.ハ I mean after all, we had all seen the being hole that was created by the 757 that had slammed into the Pentagon at 9:43 on September 11.ハ But, some of the photographs that were shown on this website raised very serious questions as to whether or not that's exactly what had happened.ハ Some of these photographs showed a
smaller hole and in some cases showed that there was no way that a 757 could have created this damage.ハ So, we began our own investigation and that started by taking a look at some of the magazines that we all saw at the supermarket checkout stands shortly after the events of September 11.


As I began pouring through the photographs I had one goal in mind and that was to prove the French wrong with their web site hunt the Boeing. ハハ After all, there must have been some photographic evidence that showed that a 757 had hit the Pentagon.ハ But as we went through all these photographs we could find no pictures whatsoever showing a tail, a nose, a fuselage, wings, engine, wheels, luggage, seats, nothing. There were no photographs showing any recognizable wreckage from a


Furthermore, when you look at the size of the hole at the Pentagon, it was approximately 65 feet across, and the height of the Pentagon is approximately 73 feet.
From wingtip to wingtip a 757 is 124 feet 10 inches.ハ From nose to tail, a 757 is 155 feet and 3 inches in length, and the height is 44 feet and 6 inches.ハ However, when you look at the hole at the Pentagon, you'll find that it's only approximately 65 feet across.ハ How does all plane of those dimensions fit into a whole only 65 feet across?


ハUpon further inspection we found that the damage at the Pentagon was completely and totally inconsistent with the damage of the planes that had hit the world trade Center.ハ I mean after all, the planes that hit the trade Center created a fire so intense that it fatigued the steel and collapsed the buildings, or so that's what we were told.ハ And yet, when you look at the left side of the Pentagon, you'll know that there is very little, if any, smoke damage or heat damage at all.ハ On the third floor itユs very plain to see a file cabinet with a computer monitor.ハ Neither of them are damaged.ハ On the second floor you can see a wooden desk.ハ It hasn't burned. And on the first floor, a very
curious sight indeed! A wooden stool with a book that is laying and open!ハ The pages aren't even singed.

さらに詳しく調 べると、ペンタゴンの被害は世界貿易センターに衝突した機体による被害とはまったく違うことに気づきました。つまり、貿易センターに衝突した飛行機が引き起こした火があまりにもすごかったので、鉄骨が溶解しビルを崩壊させた、と私たちは聞かされていました。ところがペンタゴンの左側を見ると、そこには煙や熱による被害などほとんど見られません。3階を見ると、コンピュータが載っているファイルキャビネット(引き出し)がはっきり見えます。どちらも損傷していません。2階には木製の机があります。それも燃えていません。1階には奇妙な光景が写っています。木製のスツールに本がのっていて、それが開いているのですが、ページが焦げてもいないのです。

Now each of the planes involved in the September 11 attacks had embarked upon transatlantic flights, which means that they had a majority of their fuel left over when they hit their respective targets.ハ That means that approximately 8600 remaining gallons of fuel would have been ignited when the 757 that had hit the Pentagon.ハ Again,
we look at the photographic and ask ourselves is the smoke and heat damage consistent with that amount of fuel being ignited?


ハMs. Therese Angger a certified environmental specialist and a member of the Environmental Assessors Association, sent us the following letter after a brief conversation we had on the telephone. She had said to us that the amount of fuel that would had been left in the aircraft that had hit the Pentagon would basically have reduced that section of the Pentagon to rubble and will have burned for days, and that 8600 gallons of fuel had a BTU rate of 86 million.ハ She also stated that looking at the total weight of this aircraft in conjunction with its velocity, the Pentagon should have been reduced to the thickness of a pancake.


Also, the fuel spill of 8600 gallons would have posed a very large soil removal and disposal project, since the contaminated soil would be considered モhazardous wasteモ under title for 40 of the code of federal regulations.ハ Also, looking at the total heat value output of the JP eight jet fuel at 86 million BTUs, the temperature of the fire at the Pentagon after ignition would have been in excess of 3000。F.ハ You could expect this size of an involvement to last for days, and would be visible for miles.


Another interesting question that is raised, is in the photographs of the collapsed area at the Pentagon, if you'll note the upper floors and roof area, it appears that that area has simply collapsed and it does not show any impact damage from the tail section that was over 43 feet in height.ハ How could a 757 slam into the Pentagon and not have an
impact area where that tail section would had hit the upper floors?


Shortly after these questions were raised it and the topic was open for discussion on our radio show, The Power Hour, these five frames were released from a security camera at the Pentagon.ハ The only problem is that the release of these five photographs seems to raise more questions than they answered.ハ


First of all, why was the date incorrect in the lower left corner of the screen?ハ Second of all, it really didn't show that there was a 757 that had hit the Pentagon. And thirdly, many people ask メIs this the only security camera that was on at the Pentagon?モ

The Pentagon!ハ This is the nerve center for theUnited States military, supposedly the most secure building in the country!ハ And this is the only video footage that was available of the most heinous attack ever recorded at the Pentagon?ハ Where were all the other security cameras aimed?ハ What about the security cameras that were on in the hallways of the Pentagon?ハ Every inch of the Pentagon is under video surveillance!ハ Where are those video cameras?


We also had a report about a gas station whose video camera was pointed in the exact direction where the 757 would have hit the Pentagon. Shortly after the event, it was reported that federal officials showed up at that gas station and confiscated that footage.


In addition to all the magazines that hit the newsstands and supermarket checkouts, there was a flurry of book releases that hit the local bookstores and in some cases, the book section of your local grocery store.ハ One book is メAmerica Attackedモ which was released by University Press of California, and was edited by Sarah Jess, Gabriel Beck and R. Joseph.ハ In reference to the attack at the Pentagon, on page 194 it states メThe jet had plowed a crater 100 feet wide that ripped away the walls of all five stories of the building, collapsing the outer most rings which encircle Pentagon.

新聞の売店やスーパーのレジに並んだ雑誌類に加えて、いっせいに本が出版され地域 の本屋やスーパーの本コーナーに並びました。その一つがサラ・ジェス、ガブリエル・ベック、R・ジョセフ編集、カリフォルニアのユニバーシティ出版の「アメリカ攻撃さる」です。その本は、ペンタゴンの攻撃について、194ページにこう書いています。


In this picture, we ask do you see a crater 100 feet wide?ハ Or 50 feet wide?ハ How about in this picture?ハ Or this picture?ハ It doesn't appear that there was any crater at all!ハ They went on to say that it had ripped a way the walls of the five stories of the tilting collapsing the outer most rings which encircle the Pentagon.ハ Now there should be no question that the outer rings of the Pentagon had indeed collapsed. Weユve seen pictures from one angle, from another angle and America has seen these pictures.ハ We all assumed that this was the damage that was caused by the 757 hitting the Pentagon.ハ


But, shortly after the release of the article メFrom Deception to Revelationモ, we were sent some photographs that were taken apparently right after the event and before the outer walls had collapsed.ハ When examining these photographs, we can clearly see that the area in question had not yet collapsed.ハ In fact, there is very little evidence of a whole big enough to accommodate a 757.ハ The whole that we do see is approximately 14 to 16 feet across.ハQuestion.ハ How does a 757 fit into a 16 foot hole and leave no damage or wreckage on the outside of the Pentagon?ハ These are questions that deserve serious scrutiny.


Let's take a look at some of the photographs that were taken before the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed. In this first photograph we can see the firefighters pulling the hoses away from the fire truck.ハ In the foreground we can see wire spools that were left on the front lawn of the Pentagon.


After all, this section of the Pentagon was under renovation.ハ We'll use these wire spools as reference points.ハ Also, to the right of those wire spools and on the face of the Pentagon, we can see that some concrete facing has broken away.ハ Weユll also use this as a reference point as we examine these photographs.ハ Now, to the left of that area where the facing has broken off, we can clearly see that the Pentagon has not yet collapsed.ハ There are some flaming areas, and that area appears to be the only section where there is a hole approximately 14 to 16 feet.ハ


Question:ハ How does a 757 fit into a 16 foot hole and leave no wreckage on the front of the building?ハ We can also see that the roof of the building does show fatigue, but has not yet collapsed.


In this photograph an astonished onlooker sees exactly what weユre seeing. The Pentagon had not yet collapsed, and again there is no sign of ハany wreckage whatsoever, no tail, no fuselage, no wings, no wheels, ハno engines, no seats, no luggage, nothing on the outside of the Pentagon. The Pentagon roofline is clearly visible and again it is
under fatigue but it had not yet collapsed


As we examine this next photograph letユs take a good close look at the lower left corner, youユll see engine 331 from the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority, and we contacted the fire chief from this engine company. Chief Plower agreed to come on our radio show along with two of his firefighters, but one hour before airtime they cancelled. We were told that the two firefighters had been placed on indefinite leave.


Well when you look at this photograph you can see that fire retardant foam is being sprayed on the front of the pentagon, and again, the area in question had not yet collapsed. And you can see, right in the center of the photograph, a big area where some of the concrete facing has broken away and it appears that this is the only major hole in the front of the Pentagon. Again, is this hole big enough to accommodate a 757? And where is the wreckage?


In this photograph we again see engine 331, and fire-retardant foam being sprayed on the front of the Pentagon. Note clearly in the center of the photograph we see the upper floors of the pentagon, again yet to collapse. But, also notice that there does not appear to be any damage to these upper floors. Question: If the height of a Boeing 757 was 44 feet 6 inches there should have been some point of impact in these upper floors and yet when we look at these pictures there doesn't appear to be any impact whatsoever in the area where the tail should have hit. And again, there is no wreckage visible on the front of the lawn. 


Now while these photographs were being taken, videographers from
several different networks were on the scene to capture the firefighters in action as they battled the blazes at the front of the pentagon.


FOX TV News reporter: Jim Angle is joining us now from Washington. Uh, Jim, what can you tell us about that fire outside the Pentagon? (No response) Jim Angle are you with us?


Jim Angle: Uh, I can tell you first that the roads around the White House, the streets around the White House, were blocked seconds ago. Uh, members of the uniformed division of the Secret Service ran out to intersections and started diverting traffic. There are emergency vehicles on almost every block around the White House. The road south of the White House has also been blocked. And as you know, the White House is being evacuated. Federal employees are standing on the street corners in and around the White House having left the building for fear of another attack.


ハ As you come into Washington from Virginia, about 2 miles from the pentagon, you can see the smoke billowing up from the building. Huge clouds of smoke. So much so, that uh, commuters coming into town have pulled over to the side of a busy freeway, what is ordinarily a busy freeway, and are sitting, watching in amazement as the symbol of United States Defense establishment uh, goes up in smoke. So there is an amazement all over Washington. Uh, people are not sure what to think.


Youユve got a lot of Federal employees standing around in this area watching as the streets are blocked off and emergency vehicles rush to and fro. Weユre not sure uh, what they are up to, but clearly there is concern about the safety of the (voice fades out).


Host: What could have caused this type of damage? What couldユve caused a 14-16 foot hole, and pierced three of the rings of the Pentagon? Keep in mind that each ring of the Pent has an outer and inner wall. Each wall approx 18 inches thick of steel reinforced concrete. That means that each ring consisted of 36 inches, or 3 feet, of steel reinforced
concrete for a total of approximately 9 feet of steel reinforced concrete. Question: could a 757 have pierced 9 feet of steel reinforced concrete and left a 14-16 foot hole and no wreckage? If not, what could have created that type of damage?


On our radio program, メThe Power Hourモ, we have a lot of veterans and military experts that listen in, and many have called up and agreed that it could not have been a 757 that created that damage, but in fact had to be something else all together. What could have caused that damage? Some call it a bunker buster, or a missile.


Now as this controversy percolated through the year 2002, in January of 2003 the entire issue was resurrected when the American Society of Civil Engineers released a report entitled メThe Pentagon Building Performance Reportモ. The announcement was made on CNN and they showed an animated video that illustrated how the 757 slammed into the Pentagon and took out 50 support columns. When we again look at these photographs, I ask, do you see support columns that have been destroyed? Which support columns were destroyed? How could it possibly be that the American Society of Civil Engineers could release such a report when the photographs clearly show that the entire report is in question?


(Cut to still clips of Bush)
Bush: メThere's an old saying in Tennessee ム I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee ム that says, fool me once, shame on ム shame on you. And fool me onceム you can't get fooled againモ


Host: You know there are those that see these pictures and hear this information for the first time and they inevitably ask the questionハ メWell, if the plane didn't hit the Pentagon where did it go?モ The answer is メI don't know where it went.モ For all I know it could be sitting in 200 feet of water in the Atlantic ocean, but then again I didn't say that flight 77 hit the Pentagon that was NBC and CBS and ABC and CNN and FOX and all the other news agencies. The question should be, メif flight 77 hit the pentagon then where is it?モ And lets keep in mind that if we do find someone, a group, or an agency, that is involved in the obfuscation, distraction, distortion, or cover-up of any information about any of the events of Sept 11th does that not indicate possible involvement, and even guilt, in the events of Sept 11th?


Now letユs move on to what happened in New York City on the morning of Sept 11th.


Chapter 3: "Bombs In The WTC"

[scenes of planes crashing into towers; President Bush at Florida school;ハ onlookers; towers falling; towers smoking]

HOST DAVE VONKLEIST: These are just a few of the images that are indelibly etched in the minds of every man and woman on the face of this planet that happened to be near a television set on the morning of September 11th of 2001. Most of us will never forget where we were or what we were doing on that day.


Now, right after September 11th, many conspiracy theories began to arise to try to explain how and why the towers came down. Well, this is no different than any other major event in history, from the assassination of John F. Kennedy to his brother Robert Kennedy, and from the assassinations of Martin Luther King and John Lennon to the explosion in Oklahoma City that destroyed the Murrah building in 1995 and the downing of TWA flight 800. All of these were followed by conspiracy theories to try to explain these events.


Well, on September 11th, there was a lot of discussion about explosions that went on around the building and in the building. Some of these reports were televised, but only once. Let's take a look at some of these reports and review what had happened on September 11th.


[scene of tower smoking, onlookers screaming]

VOICE OF WOMAN ONLOOKER: That was not an American airline. That was not an American airline.

女性見物人の声: あれはアメリカン航空じゃなかったわ。アメリカン航空ではなかったわよ。

[Fox News footage of tower smoldering]

VOICE OF FOX NEWS ANCHOR: ....Marc Birnbach, a Fox employee, is on the phone with us. Marc witnessed this, from what we understand. Marc, were you close enough to be able to see any markings on the airplane?

ニュースキャスター: フォックステレビの従業員、マーク・バーンバックと、電話が今つながっています。マークは、これを目撃していたとのことです。マーク、あなたは飛行機のマークが見えるほど、近くにいましたか。

MARC BIRNBACH: Uh, hi gentlemen, how are you doing? Yeah, there was um, definitely a blue logo. It was like a circular logo on the front of the plane, yeah, definitely towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I didnユt see any windows on the sides and uh definitely very low. And um, Iユm completely panicked. Iユm completely freaking out. I can't believe what I just saw.

マーク・バーンバック: あー、あの、みなさん、こんにちは。あぁ、そうですね。確かに、青い色のロゴ(マーク)がありました。まるい形のロゴのようで、飛行機の前のほうにありました。えぇ、確かに、前のほうです。決して民間の航空機のようには見えませんでした。側面に窓は全くなかったし、それに、うーん、とっても低く飛んでいたし。それで、その、私は、完全にパニックです。本当にひどく興奮しています。たった今この目で見たことが、自分でも信じられません。

NEWSCASTER: Well, we are all shaken by this. We are watching the video now back live, but the upper floors of the World Trade Center in Manhattan, in flames now after apparently two large airplanes, weユre talking about jetliners here, slammed into the sides right around 9:00 this morning.

ニュースキャスター: えぇ、私たちもみんな震えています。今ビデオを巻き戻して映して見ているところです。マンハッタンの世界貿易センターの上層階が、明らかに二機の大きな飛行機の衝突の後、炎に包まれていますが・・・。今お話しているように、複数の飛行機が今朝ちょうど9:00頃に、ビルの側面に激突しました。

Marc, if what you say is true those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you didn't see any windows in the side?


MB: I didnユt see any windows in the sides. I saw the plane flying low. I was probably like a block away from the subway in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low. And again, it was not a normal flight that Iユve ever seen at an airport. It was a plane that had a blue logo on the front and it just did not look like it belonged in this area. I mean, that's not an accident.

マーク・バーンバック: 飛行機の側面には、窓は全く見えなかったです。私は、飛行機が低く飛んでいくのを見ました。私は、ブルックリンの地下鉄から出て、1ブロックのところにいたと思います。そして、あの飛行機がとても低いところを飛んでいったのです。空港で見るような普通の飛行機ではありませんでした。前部に青いロゴ(マーク)のある飛行機で、このあたりの飛行機のようには見えなかったですね。つまりその、あれは事故ではありません。

[same scene of tower smoking, onlookers screaming]

VOICE OF WOMAN ONLOOKER: That was not an American airline.

[montage of news reporters and news footage]

CNN VOICEOVER (WOMAN): The entire top of the building just blew up....

AARON BROWN, CNN NEWS ANCHOR: It's the second explosion....

VOICEOVER, AARON BROWN, CNN: ...and another explosion....

[CNN footage of Pentagon and towers]

VOICEOVER, AARON BROWN, CNN: We have a report now of a fourth explosion at the Trade Center....

VOICEOVER, AARON BROWN, CNN: There has just been a huge explosion....
ナレーション、アーロン・ブラウン、CNN: 巨大な爆発がちょうど起きました.

[scene of tower collapsing]

VOICEOVER, AARON BROWN, CNN: It almost looks like one of those implosions of buildings that you see....
ナレーション、アーロン・ブラウン、CNN: まるで内部爆破した建物のように見えます。.

[Fox News footage of towers smoldering]

VOICEOVER, FOX NEWS: We heard a very loud blast, an explosion....[What's] not clear now is why this explosion took place....
ナレーション、フォックス・ニュース: とても大きな爆風音と爆発を聞きました。この爆発がなぜ起きたかは、はっきりしません。

[Fox News footage; reporter interviewing police officer]
[フォックス・ニュース場面; 警官にインタビューしている報道記者]

FOX NEWS REPORTER: Do you know if it was an explosion before the building collapse?

POLICE OFFICER: To me, it sounded like an explosion....
警官: 私には、それは爆発のように聞こえました....

FOX NEWS VOICEOVER: ....but it was a huge explosion....
フォックス・ニュース・ナレーション: それにしても、巨大な爆発でした....

[Fox News footage, reporter interviewing onlooker]

ONLOOKER: I saw the two buildings, I think it was a bomb because [there were] two of them [explosions]....
見物人: 2つのビルを見ました。爆弾だったと思います。2回爆発しましたから。
[Fox News footage, showing fallen debris on street, investigators]

FOX NEWS REPORTER: This is actually, we believe, debris from one of the planes that hit one of the towers of the World Trade Center. The FBI is here, as you can see. they had roped this area off. They were taking photographs and securing this area just prior to that huge explosion that we all heard and felt.


HOST DAVE VONKLEIST: In a September 24th, 2001 edition of "People" magazine, on page 34, an interview with Louis Cacchioli, a 51-year-old firefighter assigned with Engine 47 of Harlem, New York, had this to say:


[shot of "People" magazine article]

"We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck. I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building."


Well Louis Cacchioli isn't the only firefigher who claims that there were explosives or demolition charges going off in and around the world trade center.


ハ[Clip of firefighters describing the incident.]

"We made it at least two blocks and we started running. It was like, floor by floor they kept popping out, it was as if they had detonated, as if they had planned to take out the building...boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom..."


HOST: Now we've seen numerous reports of explosions, bombs, possible demolition charges, a pancake collapse of the towers. But have we seen any footage, anything that might support these particular allegations.


[Still photo of smoke as described above]

We've heard eyewitness accounts and testimony from fire officials that indicate that there were bombs, explosives, possibly detonating charges that were utilized in the collapse of the world trade center buildings. Is there any reason to believe that detonating charges were utilized in the collapse of the north tower, the south tower, or building 7?


One firefighter did say, "boom boom boom boom boom" that's how it went down. And many of the television reporters reported that as the buildings collapsed, both the north tower and the south tower and building 7, they all appeared to come down just like a controlled demolition.


Let's listen to a clip from Larry Silverstein, he was the lease owner of the world trade center as he gave an interview on CBS.


ハ(Clip of Larry Silverstein saying: I remember getting a call from the uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. And he said you know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull, then we watched the building...collapse.)

ハラリー・シルバースタインの話: 消防署長から私に電話があり、火災を消し止められるかどうかわからないと言われたことを覚えています。たくさんの人が亡くなったので、建物を壊してしまうのが得策かもしれない、と彼は言いました。そして彼らはビルを解体することを決め、それから私たちはビルが崩壊するのを見ました。

[CBS news report]
"About an hour ago World Trade Center building number 7 collapsed. A 42-story building, weakened by the devastation that had occurred earlier today."


HOST: We've all seen controlled demolitions on television. Office buildings, sports stadiums, all brought down by controlled charges. And these charges and controlled demolitions take weeks of planning.


They have to bring in experts, and do a structural analysis of the buildings, study which beams, which girders have to have charges placed on them. And then a team of explosive experts has to come and set the charges, wire them all together in sequence. And then, finally after everything is clear, they let the building go, or "pull it."


ハAre we to believe that 8 hours after a surprise attack in New York City, they were able to "pull" building 7? How is this possible, had it not been planned in advance? And if they did have planned detonation charges in place in building number 7, is it possible that there were charges in building 6? Or 5? Or 4? Or the north tower? Or the south tower?


[Clip of firefighters describing the incident.]

"We made it at least two blocks and we started running. It was like, floor by floor they kept popping out, it was as if they had detonated, as if they had planned to take out the building...boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom..."


HOST: Ladies and gentlemen, so far we've seen that we were deceived if not flat out lied to about many of the events of September 11th. From the controversy about whether or not flight 77 actually hit the pentagon, to whether or not there were bombs or explosives or detonating charges utilized in any of the buildings that collapsed in the WTC.


And also Larry Silverstein making the admission that when it came to building 7 they made the decision to "pull it." And now we come to the main events of September 11th, the north and south towers being hit by airliners, that were supposedly hijacked by terrorists. Let's take a look at some of the clips that we've all seen over and over again.


ハ(Clips of the planes crashing into North and South Towers)

4章South Tower Examination
4章 サウス・タワー(について)の検証

HOST: On April 15th of 2004 we received a news release that alerted us to a web sight that was entitled www.letsroll911.org. Phil Jayhan, the webmaster for this website had taken the video clips that youユve just seen and slowed them down and examined them frame by frame and what he found was astounding. There are several different anomalies that need to be examined and questioned. First of all, what is attached to the
bottom of the plane that hit the south tower? And second of all, what is that brief flash that occurs just as the plane makes impact?


Now when we first looked at this video footage, I said to myself, well this video footage could very well be manipulated, so I wanted to check it out myself. Well, we went and found the DVD that we had purchased shortly after September 11th entitled America Remembers. This was directly from CNN. We took this DVD and put it in our machine and examined the very clip that youユve just seen. Letユs take a look at it.

ところで、初めて私たちがこのビデオの場面を見たとき、私は「うーん、この映像は手を加えられているのかもしれないぞ」と思いました。それで早速自分自身でチェックしたいと考えました。そこで、私たちは9月11日のすぐ後に購入した「米国は忘れない(America Remembers)」という題のDVDを見つけてきました。CNNがじきじき出したものです。このDVDを自分たちのプレイヤーで再生してみました。そして先ほどお見せしたあの場面を、詳細に見ていきました。さあ、もう一度見てみましょう。

Letユs take another look at this clip in slow motion, but before we do, keep in mind that sometimes the best place to hide something is in plain sight. We've all seen this video clip. And there have been many publications that have taken frames from this video and published them in hundreds of magazines. Here is an example. On page three a full size
blow up of this picture. And in this magazine it was published on page 4. And on the back of this book that we discussed earlier, itユs on the back cover. I suggest you all take a copy of your magazines and books, and if you have the video footage take a good hard look. Weユve all got this. Now lets take a look at this in slow motion.


As the plane approaches the south tower notice carefully the belly of the plane. There appears to be something attached. And just as it hits the building thereユs a flash.


Letユs take another look in super-slow motion.


Now lets take another good hard look at this video footage. As the plane approaches it is irrefutable that there is something attached to the bottom of this plane and a distinct flash as it makes contact. Now there are some that would say that this is a trick of light, a reflection. Now lets keep in mind that if you hold a mirror in your hand and reflect the sunユs rays that reflection only goes where you aim that reflection. So a reflection should only be seen from one particular angle. Letユs take a look at this event from another angle.


And now letユs take a look at it again from a third angle. And now letユs take a look at it one more time from a fourth angle.


Ladies and gentlemen, youユve just seen a very interesting event indeed.ハNot recorded by one, but recorded by four different cameras, from four different angles. There can be no doubt that this is not the result of a reflection of any sort but in fact was a flash caused by an explosion, a detonation, a missile. Something happened that was not a
terrorist with a box-cutter.


Letユs take another look at the object attached to the belly of this plane and ask yourself this question. Could something this big have gone unnoticed by the passengers, the crew, the baggage handlers, the service personnel at a commercial airport? The obvious answer is no, it would have been noticed. Which raises the question where did this plane take off from, and was it in fact a commercial airliner at all?


SCREAMING WOMAN: That was not an American Airlines, that was not an American Airlines.

叫んでいる女性: あれはアメリカン航空じゃなかったわ、アメリカン航空ではなかったわよ。

NEWSCASTER: Marc Birnbach, a FOX employee, is on the phone with us. Marc witnessed this from what we understand. Marc, were you close enough to be able to see any markings on the airplane? 

ニュースキャスター: フォックスの従業員、マーク・バーンバックと、電話が今つ

MARC BIRNBACH: Uh, hi gentlemen, how are you doing? Yeah, there was um, definitely a blue logo. It was like a circular logo on the front of the plane, yeah, definitely towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I didnユt see any windows on the sides and uh definitely very low. And um, Iユm completely panicked. Iユm completely freaking out. I can't believe what I just saw.

マーク・バーンバック: あー、あの、みなさん、いかがですか。あぁ、そうですね。確かに、青い色のロゴ(マーク)がありました。まるい形のロゴ(マーク)のようで、飛行機の前のほうにありました。えぇ、確かに、前のほうです。決して民間の航空機のようには見えませんでした。側面に窓は全くなかったし、それに、うーん、とっても低く飛んでいたし。それで、その、私は、完全にパニックです。本当にひどく興奮しています。たった今この目で見たことが、自分でも信じられません。

NEWSCASTER: Well, we are all shaken by this. We are watching the video now back live, but the upper floors of the World Trade Center in Manhattan, in flames now after apparently two large airplanes, weユre talking about jetliners here, slammed into the sides right around 9:00 this morning.

ニュースキャスター: えぇ、私たちもみんな震えてえいます。今ビデオを巻き戻して映して見ているところです。マンハッタンの世界貿易センターの上層階が、明らかに2機の大きな飛行機の衝突の後、炎に包まれていますが・・・。今お話しているように、複数の飛行機が今朝ちょうど9:00頃に、ビルの側面に激突しました。

Marc, if what you say is true those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you didn't see any windows in the side?


MB: I didnユt see any windows in the sides. I saw the plane flying low. I was probably like a block away from the subway in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low. And again, it was not a normal flight that Iユve ever seen at an airport. It was a plane that had a blue logo on the front and it just did not look like it belonged in this area. ハI mean it was not an accident

マーク・バーンバック: 飛行機の側面には、窓は全く見えなかったです。私は、飛行機が低く飛んでいくのを見ました。私は、ブルックリンの地下鉄から出て、1ブロックのところにいたと思います。そして、あの飛行機がとても低いところを飛んでいったのです。空港で見るような普通の飛行機ではありませんでした。前部に青いロゴ(マーク)のある飛行機で、このあたりの飛行機のようには見えなかったですね。つまり、あれは事故ではないですね。

HOST: Now weユve just heard testimony that refutes the official report that a commercial airliner hit the World Trade Center. Well, if it wasnユt a commercial airliner it would have to be either a private, or a military aircraft. And I think we can rule out private aircraft. Now if this was a military plane, that would explain the possibility that there was something mounted on the belly of the plane. Now Phil Jayhan, webmaster of the website letsroll911.org, and many other people, have postulated that this indeed was a pod of some sort mounted to the belly of the plane. 

ホスト: さて、私たちはたった今、「民間の航空機が世界貿易センターに激突した」とする公式発表に異議を唱える証言を耳にしました。では、民間の飛行機ではないとすれば、私有の飛行機か、軍用機のどちらかのはずです。そして、私有機は除外することができると思います。さて、もしこれが軍用機だとすれば、飛行機の下部に何かが装着されていたという可能性を説明してくれるでしょう。ホームページwww.letsroll911.org.のウェブマスターのフィル・ジェイハンや、他の多くの人たちは、実際何かの容器が飛行機の下部に装着されていたと仮定しています。

Many of our listeners are ex-military and have agreed that this is a distinct possibility. When you couple this with the mysterious flash that occurs on the side of the World Trade Center just as the plane makes contact, I think that we can probably agree that
there was some sort of an incendiary, or an explosive, that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of fuel that would be dispersed as soon as the plane hit the building. 


Letユs take another look at this one clip and youユll notice that the flash is a separate
event than the contact of the fuselage as it hits the building. Some folks have stated that the flash was the result of the fuselage making contact with the trade center building, but as you can see, the flash is indeed to the right of the fuselage and in fact as the fuselage makes contact with the World Trade Tower you can see a reflection of
the flash in the fuselage, which further supports the contention that these are two separate events.

もう一度この場面を見てみましょう。この閃光は、飛行機が衝突して胴体がビルと接触するのとは、別の出来事であることに気づかれることでしょう。「閃光が生じたのは、機体が世界貿易センターに衝突した結果である」と述べていた人たちがいますが、みなさんがご覧になったように、閃光は実際には、飛行機の胴体の右のほうにあって、 実は、機体が世界貿易センターに衝突するときに、飛行機の胴体に閃光が反射して見えているのです。これは、これらの出来事が、二つの別々の出来事だという主張を、さらに支持してくれるものです。

5章North Tower Examination

5章 北タワーの検証

HOST: Admittedly what weユve seen so far in this presentation is disturbing to say the least. To find that we were not necessarily told the truth about what happened at the Pentagon on Sept. 11th, and now according to the clips that youユve just seen and the testimony that youユve just heard, there was a whole lot more to the story when flight 175 hit the south tower.


Well, I needed more information. I needed more evidence to show that there was something else going on on September 11th. And the only way to get more information was to go to the first plane, flight 11 the American airliner, that hit the north tower. The French filmmakers, the Naudet brothers, were in New York City doing a documentary about the New York City firefighters, and this clip is the only known footage of the first plane hitting the first tower.


Letユs take another look at this video clip, this time in slow motion. Youユll notice that as the plane approaches the tower, first of all, weユre too far away to get a clear shot of any detail of the plane. So therefore, itユs hard to make whether or not there was anything attached to the bottom of this plane, as was the case with flight 175.


However, there is another similarity. Just as the plane makes impact, there is a flash. Letユs look at it again, and keep in mind that as we watch this plane make impact, this flash occurs just before the plane crashes into the north tower.


This time as we watch this clip, note the shadow rising from the lower right of the trade center tower. And keep in mind that the shadow wonユt reach the impact point before the plane and vice versa. This is very important because the flash occurs before the shadow and the plane meet. This time lets look at this clip in reverse. Youユll notice that as the plane slowly backs out of the north tower, it is clear the tower, and then the flash occurs, indicating that the flash occurred before the plane made impact on the north tower. One more time, this video clip showing the flash, as the plane hit the north tower.


Now this video clip that weユve just examined came again from the Naudet brothersユ documentary that was being filmed in the streets of New York City on the morning of September 11th. This documentary about the New York City firefighters was going to be assembled at a later date and it was not televised. In fact there was no live coverage at all of flight 11 as it hit the north tower. After all, it was a surprise attack. So if there was no live television coverage of the first plane hitting the first tower, how do we explain the following comment from George Walker Bush?


STUDENT: What was the first thing that went through your head when you heard that a plane crashed into the firstノ

BUSH: Well, I was sitting in uh, a schoolhouse in Florida. I had gone down to tell my little brother what to do and uh (laughter from audience) (aside: You can go ahead and sit down.) Just kidding, Jeb. And uh, its the mother in me. (more laughter) Anyway, uh, I uh was sitting there and my chief of staff, well first of all when we walked into the classroom I had seen this uh plane fly into the first building, there was a tv s-set on,ハAnd uh, you know I thought it was pilot error.




HOST: You know, right off the bat there will probably be some folks out there that will try to minimize or negate what weユve discussed in this program, and turn it into some sort of a political football. Theyユll say weユre left-wingers or weユre Democrat liberal types and weユre Bush bashing.


Nothing could be farther from the truth. Letユs not forget that it was under the Clinton administration that we launched a missile attack in Afghanistan and Sudan to destroy what turned out to be an aspirin factory because they had bad intel that they were manufacturing chemicals. Itユs happening again folks. It has nothing to do with liberal vs. conservative, or Democrat vs. Republican, or right vs. left. It has everything to do with right vs. wrong.


第6章War On Freedom
第6章 自由に対する戦争 

In the beginning of this program we played word association, if you recall. The term was conspiracy theory. Now youユve seen enough evidence in this presentation to know that we are dealing now with a conspiracy. There is plenty of evidence to support it.


The conspiracy theory in fact is the idea that Osama bin Laden had something to do with the attacks of September 11th. Letユs not forget that on September 23rd of 2001, Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor, had stated that they had evidence that linked bin Laden with the terrorist attacks, and that they would release that evidence in due time. Well America and the world are still waiting for that evidence. And in that time since September 11th, weユve launched not one, but two wars, in Afghanistan and Iraq, based upon no evidence or, a conspiracy theory.


BUSH: (clip 1) Our war is against evil, not against Islam.
(clip 2) We don't hold any religion accountable, weユre fighting evil.


HOST: What weユve seen on this video should give us all cause to stop and rethink everything that weユve been told about September 11th. The media and our government have relentlessly pounded into Americansユ minds that it was terrorists wielding box cutters that were responsible for the attacks in America on September 11th. And now after seeing this video footage we realize that it couldnユt possibly have been a terrorist and a box cutter that wouldユve created the flashes on both the north and south tower. Nor could it have been a terrorist with a box cutter that had that attachment to the bottom of flight 175.

デイヴ: このビデオでご覧になった内容は、「私たちがこれまで、9・11について聞かされてきたことのすべてを考え直す必要がある」と示唆しています。メディアと政府は「9・11にアメリカを襲った犯人は、カッターナイフをふり回していたテロリストたちだ」とアメリカ人の頭に容赦なく叩き込んできました。しかし今このビデオを観て、私たちはどう考えても「カッターナイフを持ったテロリストたちに、北と南の両方のタワーであの閃光を生じさせることなどできない」と、わかります。175便の腹部にあんな付属品をつけたのは、カッターナイフのテロリストでないことも。

There is one truth thatユs come out of this, though. And that is that there is a war on freedom, but the war on freedom isnユt being waged by those that they say it is.ハ After all, how many of your freedoms have been legislated away by Osama bin Laden or the Taliban or al Qaeda or Saddam Hussein?


The answer is none. Your freedoms have been legislated away by the very people who take oaths to defend your freedoms. Republicans and Democrats alike. ハYour Congress, your Senate, your President. There is a war on freedom. And now thanks to the Homeland Security Bill, the Patriot Act, the Terrorist Bill, the Model States Emergency Health Powers Act we have thumb scanners and retina scans and face recognition, metal detectors. At the airports we have body scans, and body cavity searches. Yes there is a war on freedom. And letユs not forget what George Bush had said in regard to conspiracy theories.


BUSH: (clip 1) Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th. Malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.
(clip 2) Every nation in every region now has a decision to make.ハEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.


(September 11 Commission, Public Hearing)
RUDOLPH GIULIANI (Former New York City Mayor 1994 ? 2001): ノa much
calmer situation and a much better evacuation and these peopleノ
HYSTERICAL WOMAN: My son was murderedノmurdered
ANGRY REPORTER: Letユs ask some real questions. Letユs ask some real questions, is that unfair? And what about the bunker? You didn't ask him about the bunker? The office of emergency management bunker on fire.ハRemember this, your government funded and trained al Qaeda. Repeat it again, your government funded and trained al Qaeda.

ルドルフ・ジュリアーニ(前ニューヨーク市長 1994〜2001): ノノ
興奮した女性: 私の息子は殺されたんですノノ殺されたんです
怒りのレポーター: 本当の質問をしようじゃないか。もっと大事な質問をしようじゃないか、それはダメかい? あのバンカー(訳注:ニューヨーク市が7番ビルに仕掛けた緊急管理事務所のあだ名)はどうなった?彼にバンカーのことを聞かなかったじゃないか? 緊急管理局の事務所が燃えたこと。覚えてるだろう、この政府がアルカイダに資金を渡し、訓練したんだ。もう一度言うぞ、あんたの政府がアルカイダに資金提供し、訓練をしたんだ。 

HOST: And now I ask all of America, and the people of the world, where's
your line in the sand?
デイヴ: そして今、アメリカと世界の人々に伺います。あなたはどちら側につきますか?